Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

ZZ freedom in two qubit gates

arXiv
Authors: Xuexin Xu, M. H. Ansari

Year

2020

Paper ID

21053

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

108

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Superconducting qubits on a circuit exhibit an always-on state-dependent phase error. This error is due to sub-MHz parasitic interaction that repels computational levels from non-computational ones. We study a general theory to evaluate the `static' repulsion between seemingly idle qubits as well as the `dynamical' repulsion between entangled qubits under microwave driving gate. By combining qubits of either the same or opposite anharmonicity signs we find the characteristics of static and dynamical ZZ freedoms. The latter universally eliminate the parasitic repulsion, leading us to mitigate high fidelity gate operation. Our theory introduces new opportunities for making perfect entangled and unentangled states which is extremely useful for quantum technology.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Superconducting qubits on a circuit exhibit an always-on state-dependent phase error.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #21053 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69543 Quantum Information Geometry of... #69536 Quantum Algorithm for Open-Syst... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.