Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Uncertainty principle for axial power content of highly focused fields

arXiv
Authors: R. Martinez-Herrero, A. Carnicer, I. Juvells, A. S. Sanz

Year

2020

Paper ID

20818

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In the analysis of the on-axis intensity for a highly focused optical field it is highly desirable to deal with effective relations aimed at characterizing the field behavior in a rather simple fashion. Here, a novel and adequate measure for the size of the region where the axial power content mainly concentrates is proposed on the basis of an uncertainty principle. Accordingly, a meaningful relationship is provided for both the spread of the incident beam at the entrance of the highly focused optical system and the size of the region where the on-axis power mainly concentrates.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In the analysis of the on-axis intensity for a highly focused optical field it is highly desirable to deal with effective relations aimed at characterizing the field behavior...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #20818 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.