Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Short proof of a spectral Chernoff bound for local Hamiltonians

arXiv
Authors: Nilin Abrahamsen

Year

2020

Paper ID

20799

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

106

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We give a simple proof of a Chernoff bound for the spectrum of a k-local Hamiltonian based on Weyl's inequalities. The complexity of estimating the spectrum's ε(n)-th quantile up to constant relative error thus exhibits the following dichotomy: For ε(n)=d-n the problem is NP-hard and maybe even QMA-hard, yet there exists constant a>1 such that the problem is trivial for ε(n)=a-n. We note that a related Chernoff bound due to Kuwahara and Saito (Ann. Phys. '20) for a generalized problem is also sufficient to establish such a dichotomy, its proof relying on a careful analysis of the cluster expansion.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We give a simple proof of a Chernoff bound for the spectrum of a k-local Hamiltonian based on Weyl's inequalities.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #20799 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ... #69027 Computational Superiority of No...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.