Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
The Heisenberg limit for laser coherence
arXiv
Authors: Travis J. Baker, S. N. Saadatmand, Dominic W. Berry, Howard M. Wiseman
Year
2020
Paper ID
20777
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
To quantify quantum optical coherence requires both the particle- and wave-natures of light. For an ideal laser beam [1,2,3], it can be thought of roughly as the number of photons emitted consecutively into the beam with the same phase. This number, mathfrak{C}, can be much larger than μ, the number of photons in the laser itself. The limit on mathfrak{C} for an ideal laser was thought to be of order μ2 [4,5]. Here, assuming nothing about the laser operation, only that it produces a beam with certain properties close to those of an ideal laser beam, and that it does not have external sources of coherence, we derive an upper bound: mathfrak{C} = O\(μ4\). Moreover, using the matrix product states (MPSs) method [6,7,8,9], we find a model that achieves this scaling, and show that it could in principle be realised using circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED) [10]. Thus mathfrak{C} = O\(μ2\) is only a standard quantum limit (SQL); the ultimate quantum limit, or Heisenberg limit, is quadratically better.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- To quantify quantum optical coherence requires both the particle- and wave-natures of light.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.