Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Local trade-off between information and disturbance in quantum measurements

arXiv
Authors: Hiroaki Terashima

Year

2020

Paper ID

20490

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This study confirms a local trade-off between information and disturbance in quantum measurements. It is represented by the correlation between the changes in these two quantities when the measurement is slightly modified. The correlation indicates that when the measurement is modified to increase the obtained information, the disturbance also increases in most cases. However, the information can be increased while decreasing the disturbance because the correlation is not necessarily perfect. For measurements having imperfect correlations, this paper discusses a general scheme that raises the amount of information while decreasing the disturbance.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This study confirms a local trade-off between information and disturbance in quantum measurements.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #20490 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.