Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

A quantum moat barrier, realized with a finite square well

arXiv
Authors: A. Ibrahim, F. Marsiglio

Year

2020

Paper ID

20270

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

138

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The notion of a double well potential typically involves two regions of space separated by a repulsive potential barrier. The solution is a wave function that is suppressed in the barrier region and localized in the two surrounding regions. Remarkably, we illustrate that similar solutions can be achieved using an attractive "barrier" potential (a "quantum moat") instead of a repulsive one (a "quantum wall"). The reason this works is intimately connected to the concepts of "orthogonalized plane waves" and the pseudopotential method, both originally used to understand electronic band structures in solids. While the main goal of this work is to use a simple model to demonstrate the barrier-like attribute of a quantum moat, we also show how the pseudopotential method is used to greatly improve the efficiency of constructing wave functions for this system using matrix diagonalization.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The notion of a double well potential typically involves two regions of space separated by a repulsive potential barrier.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #20270

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.