Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
A quantum moat barrier, realized with a finite square well
arXiv
Authors: A. Ibrahim, F. Marsiglio
Year
2020
Paper ID
20270
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The notion of a double well potential typically involves two regions of space separated by a repulsive potential barrier. The solution is a wave function that is suppressed in the barrier region and localized in the two surrounding regions. Remarkably, we illustrate that similar solutions can be achieved using an attractive "barrier" potential (a "quantum moat") instead of a repulsive one (a "quantum wall"). The reason this works is intimately connected to the concepts of "orthogonalized plane waves" and the pseudopotential method, both originally used to understand electronic band structures in solids. While the main goal of this work is to use a simple model to demonstrate the barrier-like attribute of a quantum moat, we also show how the pseudopotential method is used to greatly improve the efficiency of constructing wave functions for this system using matrix diagonalization.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The notion of a double well potential typically involves two regions of space separated by a repulsive potential barrier.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.