Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Refuting a Proposed Axiom for Defining the Exact Rotating Wave Approximation
arXiv
Authors: Daniel Zeuch, David P. DiVincenzo
Year
2020
Paper ID
20171
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
173
Citations
N/A
Abstract
For a linearly driven quantum two-level system, or qubit, sets of stroboscropic points along the cycloidal-like trajectory in the rotating frame can be approximated using the exact rotating wave approximation introduced in arXiv:1807.02858. That work introduces an effective Hamiltonian series mathcal Heff generating smoothed qubit trajectories; this series has been obtained using a combination of a Magnus expansion and a Taylor series, a Magnus-Taylor expansion. Since, however, this Hamiltonian series is not guaranteed to converge for arbitrary pulse shapes, the same work hypothesizes an axiomatic definition of the effective Hamiltonian. The first two of the proposed axioms define mathcal Heff to (i) be analytic and (ii) generate a stroboscopic time evolution. In this work we probe a third axiom---motivated by the smoothed trajectories mentioned above---namely, (iii) a variational principle stating that the integral of the Hamiltonian's positive eigenvalue taken over the full pulse duration is minimized by this mathcal Heff. We numerically refute the validity of this third axiom via a variational minimization of the said integral.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- For a linearly driven quantum two-level system, or qubit, sets of stroboscropic points along the cycloidal-like trajectory in the rotating frame can be approximated using the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.