Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Solving Klein's paradox

arXiv
Authors: Huai-Yu Wang

Year

2020

Paper ID

19973

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

122

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We figure out the famous Klein's paradox arising from the reflection problem when a Dirac particle encounters a step potential with infinite width. The key is to piecewise solve Dirac equation in such a way that in the region where the particle's energy E is greater (less) than the potential V, the solution of the positive (negative) energy branch is adopted. In the case of Klein-Gordon equation with a piecewise constant potential, the equation is decoupled to positive and negative energy equations, and reflection problem is solved in the same way. Both infinitely and finitely wide potentials are considered. The reflection coefficient never exceeds 1. The results are applied to discuss the transmissions of particles with no mass or with very small mass.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We figure out the famous Klein's paradox arising from the reflection problem when a Dirac particle encounters a step potential with infinite width.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19973 #75781 Quantum Computing for Industria... #75774 A Quantum Algorithm for Solving... #75766 A Quantum Dynamics Tutorial: Vi... #75757 Quantum Coordination Advantages...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.