You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Subsystem codes with high thresholds by gauge fixing and reduced qubit overhead
arXiv
Authors: Oscar Higgott, Nikolas P. Breuckmann
Year
2020
Paper ID
19837
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
172
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce a technique that uses gauge fixing to significantly improve the quantum error correcting performance of subsystem codes. By changing the order in which check operators are measured, valuable additional information can be gained, and we introduce a new method for decoding which uses this information to improve performance. Applied to the subsystem toric code with three-qubit check operators, we increase the threshold under circuit-level depolarising noise from 0.67\% to 0.81\%. The threshold increases further under a circuit-level noise model with small finite bias, up to 2.22\% for infinite bias. Furthermore, we construct families of finite-rate subsystem LDPC codes with three-qubit check operators and optimal-depth parity-check measurement schedules. To the best of our knowledge, these finite-rate subsystem codes outperform all known codes at circuit-level depolarising error rates as high as 0.2\%, where they have a qubit overhead that is 4.3times lower than the most efficient version of the surface code and 5.1times lower than the subsystem toric code. Their threshold and pseudo-threshold exceeds 0.42\% for circuit-level depolarising noise, increasing to 2.4\% under infinite bias using gauge fixing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce a technique that uses gauge fixing to significantly improve the quantum error correcting performance of subsystem codes.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.