Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

MAXCUT QAOA performance guarantees for p >1

arXiv
Authors: Jonathan Wurtz, Peter J. Love

Year

2020

Paper ID

19751

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

133

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We obtain worst case performance guarantees for p=2 and 3 QAOA for MAXCUT on uniform 3-regular graphs. Previous work by Farhi et al obtained a lower bound on the approximation ratio of 0.692 for p=1. We find a lower bound of 0.7559 for p=2, where worst case graphs are those with no cycles leq 5. This bound holds for any 3 regular graph evaluated at particular fixed parameters. We conjecture a hierarchy for all p, where worst case graphs have with no cycles leq 2p+1. Under this conjecture, the approximation ratio is at least 0.7924 for all 3 regular graphs and p=3. In addition, using a simple indistinguishability argument we find an upper bound on the worst case approximation ratio for all p, which indicates classes of graphs for which there can be no quantum advantage for at least p<6.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We obtain worst case performance guarantees for p=2 and 3 QAOA for MAXCUT on uniform 3-regular graphs.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19751 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.