Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Unconditional preparation of squeezed vacuum from Rabi interactions

arXiv
Authors: Jacob Hastrup, Kimin Park, Radim Filip, Ulrik L. Andersen

Year

2020

Paper ID

19699

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

87

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Squeezed states of harmonic oscillators are a central resource for continuous-variable quantum sensing, computation and communication. Here we propose a method for the generation of very good approximations to highly squeezed vacuum states with low excess anti-squeezing using only a few oscillator-qubit coupling gates through a Rabi-type interaction Hamiltonian. This interaction can be implemented with several different methods, which has previously been demonstrated in superconducting circuit and trapped-ion platforms. The protocol is compatible with other protocols manipulating quantum harmonic oscillators, thus facilitating scalable continuous-variable fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Squeezed states of harmonic oscillators are a central resource for continuous-variable quantum sensing, computation and communication.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19699 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe... #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.