Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

Bridging Classical and Quantum with SDP initialized warm-starts for QAOA

arXiv
Authors: Reuben Tate, Majid Farhadi, Creston Herold, Greg Mohler, Swati Gupta

Year

2020

Paper ID

19629

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

136

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in the context of the Max-Cut problem. Near-term (noisy) quantum devices are only able to (accurately) execute QAOA at low circuit depths while QAOA requires a relatively high circuit-depth in order to "see" the whole graph. We introduce a classical pre-processing step that initializes QAOA with a biased superposition of all possible cuts in the graph, referred to as a warm-start. In particular, our initialization informs QAOA by a solution to a low-rank semidefinite programming relaxation of the Max-Cut problem. Our experimental results show that this variant of QAOA, called QAOA-Warm, is able to outperform standard QAOA on lower circuit depths with less training time (in the optimization stage for QAOA's variational parameters). We provide experimental evidence as well as theoretical intuition on performance of the proposed framework.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in the context of the Max-Cut problem.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19629

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.