Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Realisation of adiabatic and diabatic CZ gates in superconducting qubits coupled with a tunable coupler
arXiv
Authors: Huikai Xu, Weiyang Liu, Zhiyuan Li, Jiaxiu Han, Jingning Zhang, Kehuan Linghu, Yongchao Li, Mo Chen, Zhen Yang, Junhua Wang, Teng Ma, Guangming Xue, Yirong Jin, Haifeng Yu
Year
2020
Paper ID
19627
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
High fidelity two-qubit gates are fundamental for scaling up the superconducting number. We use two qubits coupled via a frequency-tunable coupler which can adjust the coupling strength, and demonstrate the CZ gate using two different schemes, adiabatic and diabatic methods. The Clifford based Randomized Benchmarking (RB) method is used to assess and optimize the CZ gate fidelity. The fidelity of adiabatic and diabatic CZ gates are 99.53(8)% and 98.72(2)%, respectively. We also analyze the errors induced by the decoherence. Comparing to 30 ns duration time of adiabatic CZ gate, the duration time of diabatic CZ gate is 19 ns, revealing lower incoherence error rate r'_{rm{incoherent, int}} = 0.0197(5) than r_{rm{incoherent, int}} = 0.0223(3).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- High fidelity two-qubit gates are fundamental for scaling up the superconducting number.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.