Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Searching spin-mass interaction using a diamagnetic levitated magnetic resonance force sensor
arXiv
Authors: Fang Xiong, Tong Wu, Yingchun Leng, Rui Li, Changkui Duan, Xi Kong, Pu Huang, Zhengwei Li, Yu Gao, Xing Rong, Jiangfeng Du
Year
2020
Paper ID
19622
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Axion-like particles (ALPs) are predicted to mediate exotic interactions between spin and mass. We propose an ALP-searching experiment based on the levitated micromechanical oscillator, which is one of the most sensitive sensors for spin-mass forces at a short distance. The proposed experiment tests the spin-mass resonant interaction between the polarized electron spins and a diamagnetically levitated microsphere. By periodically flipping the electron spins, the contamination from nonresonant background forces can be eliminated. The levitated microoscillator can prospectively enhance the sensitivity by nearly 103 times over current experiments for ALPs with mass in the range 4 meV to 0.4 eV.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Axion-like particles (ALPs) are predicted to mediate exotic interactions between spin and mass.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.