Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Computational approaches to efficient generation of the stationary state for incoherent light excitation

arXiv
Authors: Ignacio Loaiza, Artur F. Izmaylov, Paul Brumer

Year

2020

Paper ID

19530

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Light harvesting processes are often computationally studied from a time-dependent viewpoint, in line with ultrafast coherent spectroscopy experiments. Yet, natural processes take place in the presence of incoherent light, which induces a stationary state. Such stationary states can be described using the eigenbasis of the molecular Hamiltonian, but for realistic systems a full diagonalization is prohibitively expensive. We propose three efficient computational approaches to obtaining the stationary state that circumvent system Hamiltonian diagonalization. The connection between the incoherent perturbations, decoherence, and Kraus operators is established.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Light harvesting processes are often computationally studied from a time-dependent viewpoint, in line with ultrafast coherent spectroscopy experiments.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19530 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.