Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Thermodynamics Quantum Foundations

A principle of information conservation for physical laws (Hidden information in quantum systems?)

arXiv
Authors: Nicolas Underwood

Year

2020

Paper ID

19507

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A principle of information conservation is shown in abstract terms to rule out probabilistic physical laws, necessitating the existence of state trajectories. It furthermore provides a geometric-thermodynamic mechanism for the appearance of probability distributions at the operational level, and thus may provide a dynamical explanation for Born's rule of quantum probabilities. This link between geometry and operational probabilities is argued to be a promising angle from which to study the potential for "hidden information" in quantum systems, and guide efforts in quantum foundations more generally.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A principle of information conservation is shown in abstract terms to rule out probabilistic physical laws, necessitating the existence of state trajectories.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19507 #69036 CARVE-Q: Quantum-Proposed, Clas... #69035 A Modular Approach to Succinct ... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68989 Quantum correlations in QBism's...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.