Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Random Access Codes for Boolean Functions
arXiv
Authors: João F. Doriguello, Ashley Montanaro
Year
2020
Paper ID
19333
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
222
Citations
N/A
Abstract
An noverset{p}{mapsto}m random access code (RAC) is an encoding of n bits into m bits such that any initial bit can be recovered with probability at least p, while in a quantum RAC (QRAC), the n bits are encoded into m qubits. Since its proposal, the idea of RACs was generalized in many different ways, e.g. allowing the use of shared entanglement (called entanglement-assisted random access code, or simply EARAC) or recovering multiple bits instead of one. In this paper we generalize the idea of RACs to recovering the value of a given Boolean function f on any subset of fixed size of the initial bits, which we call f-random access codes. We study and give protocols for f-random access codes with classical (f-RAC) and quantum (f-QRAC) encoding, together with many different resources, e.g. private or shared randomness, shared entanglement (f-EARAC) and Popescu-Rohrlich boxes (f-PRRAC). The success probability of our protocols is characterized by the noise stability of the Boolean function f. Moreover, we give an upper bound on the success probability of any f-QRAC with shared randomness that matches its success probability up to a multiplicative constant (and f-RACs by extension), meaning that quantum protocols can only achieve a limited advantage over their classical counterparts.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- An noversetpmapstom random access code (RAC) is an encoding of n bits into m bits such that any initial bit can be recovered with probability at least p, while in a quantum RAC...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.