Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Comparative Study of State-of-the-Art Matrix-Product-State Methods for Lattice Models with Large Local Hilbert Spaces
arXiv
Authors: Jan Stolpp, Thomas Köhler, Salvatore R. Manmana, Eric Jeckelmann, Fabian Heidrich-Meisner, Sebastian Paeckel
Year
2020
Paper ID
19288
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Lattice models consisting of high-dimensional local degrees of freedom without global particle-number conservation constitute an important problem class in the field of strongly correlated quantum many-body systems. For instance, they are realized in electron-phonon models, cavities, atom-molecule resonance models, or superconductors. In general, these systems elude a complete analytical treatment and need to be studied using numerical methods where matrix-product states (MPS) provide a flexible and generic ansatz class. Typically, MPS algorithms scale at least quadratic in the dimension of the local Hilbert spaces. Hence, tailored methods, which truncate this dimension, are required to allow for efficient simulations. Here, we describe and compare three state-of-the-art MPS methods each of which exploits a different approach to tackle the computational complexity. We analyze the properties of these methods for the example of the Holstein model, performing high-precision calculations as well as a finite-size-scaling analysis of relevant ground-state obervables. The calculations are performed at different points in the phase diagram yielding a comprehensive picture of the different approaches.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Lattice models consisting of high-dimensional local degrees of freedom without global particle-number conservation constitute an important problem class in the field of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.