Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Predicting impurity spectral functions using machine learning
arXiv
Authors: Erica J. Sturm, Matthew R. Carbone, Deyu Lu, Andreas Weichselbaum, Robert M. Konik
Year
2020
Paper ID
19110
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
168
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Anderson Impurity Model (AIM) is a canonical model of quantum many-body physics. Here we investigate whether machine learning models, both neural networks (NN) and kernel ridge regression (KRR), can accurately predict the AIM spectral function in all of its regimes, from empty orbital, to mixed valence, to Kondo. To tackle this question, we construct two large spectral databases containing approximately 410k and 600k spectral functions of the single-channel impurity problem. We show that the NN models can accurately predict the AIM spectral function in all of its regimes, with point-wise mean absolute errors down to 0.003 in normalized units. We find that the trained NN models outperform models based on KRR and enjoy a speedup on the order of 105 over traditional AIM solvers. The required size of the training set of our model can be significantly reduced using furthest point sampling in the AIM parameter space, which is important for generalizing our method to more complicated multi-channel impurity problems of relevance to predicting the properties of real materials.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Anderson Impurity Model (AIM) is a canonical model of quantum many-body physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.