Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
Making sense of Born's rule p_α=lVertΨ_αrVert2 with the many-minds interpretation
arXiv
Authors: Aurélien Drezet
Year
2020
Paper ID
19076
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This work is an attempt to justify Born's rule within the framework of the many-minds interpretation seen as a development of the many-worlds interpretation of Everett. More precisely, here we develop a unitary model of many-minds based on the work of Albert and Loewer Synthese textbf{77}, 195 (1988). At the difference of previous models ours is not genuinely stochastic and dualistic and also involves some classical-like randomness concerning the initial conditions of the Universe. We also compare the present method for recovering Born's rule with previous works based on decision theory à la Deutsch, Wallace, and envariance à la Zurek and show how these approaches are connected to our model
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This work is an attempt to justify Born's rule within the framework of the many-minds interpretation seen as a development of the many-worlds interpretation of Everett.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.