Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Geometrical dependence in Casimir-Polder repulsion

arXiv
Authors: John Joseph Marchetta, Prachi Parashar, K. V. Shajesh

Year

2020

Paper ID

19046

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

90

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Repulsion, induced from quantum vacuum fluctuations, for an anisotropically polarizable atom on the symmetry axis of an anisotropically polarizable annular disc is studied. There exists two torsion free points on each side of the annular disc, where the interaction energy is orientation independent. The position of second of the two torsion free points, on either side of the disc, is shown to determine the orientation dependence of the atom at distances far from the plate, revealing a geometrical dependence. In the ring limit of the annular disc, new repulsion emerges.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Repulsion, induced from quantum vacuum fluctuations, for an anisotropically polarizable atom on the symmetry axis of an anisotropically polarizable annular disc is studied.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #19046 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.