Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Machine learning recognition of light orbital-angular-momentum superpositions
arXiv
Authors: B. Pinheiro da Silva, B. A. D. Marques, R. B. Rodrigues, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, A. Z. Khoury
Year
2020
Paper ID
18853
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
98
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We developed a method to characterize arbitrary superpositions of light orbital angular momentum (OAM) with high fidelity by using astigmatic tomography and machine learning processing. In order to define each superposition unequivocally, we combine two intensity measurements. The first one is the direct image of the input beam, which cannot distinguish between opposite OAM components. This ambiguity is removed by a second image obtained after astigmatic transformation of the input beam. Samples of these image pairs are used to train a convolution neural network and achieve high fidelity recognition of arbitrary OAM superpositions with dimension up to five.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We developed a method to characterize arbitrary superpositions of light orbital angular momentum (OAM) with high fidelity by using astigmatic tomography and machine learning...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.