Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum block lookahead adders and the wait for magic states
arXiv
Authors: Craig Gidney
Year
2020
Paper ID
18786
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We improve the Toffoli count of low depth quantum adders, and analyze how their spacetime cost reacts to having a limited number of magic state factories. We present a block lookahead adder that parallelizes across blocks of bits of size b, instead of over all bits. The block lookahead adder achieves a Toffoli count of 3n + 5n/b for out of place addition (vs 4n in previous work by Thapliyal et al) and 5n + 8n/b for in place addition (vs 7n in previous work by Thapliyal et al). The tradeoff is that the reaction depth of these circuits depends linearly on b, and they use additional workspace. We estimate the spacetime volume of these adders, and adders from previous work, for various register sizes and factory counts under plausible assumptions for a large scale quantum computer based on the surface code and superconducting qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We improve the Toffoli count of low depth quantum adders, and analyze how their spacetime cost reacts to having a limited number of magic state factories.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.