Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Coherence and decoherence in the Harper-Hofstadter model
arXiv
Authors: Qi-Yu Liang, Dimitris Trypogeorgos, Ana Valdés-Curiel, Junheng Tao, Mingshu Zhao, Ian B. Spielman
Year
2020
Paper ID
18749
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We quantum-simulated the 2D Harper-Hofstadter (HH) lattice model in a highly elongated tube geometry - three sites in circumference - using an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate. In addition to the usual transverse (out-of-plane) magnetic flux, piercing the surface of the tube, we threaded a longitudinal flux Φrm L down the axis of the tube This geometry evokes an Aharonov-Bohm interferometer, where noise in Φrm L would readily decohere the interference present in trajectories encircling the tube. We observe this behavior only when transverse flux is a rational fraction of the flux-quantum, and remarkably find that for irrational fractions the decoherence is absent. Furthermore, at rational values of transverse flux, we show that the time evolution averaged over the noisy longitudinal flux matches the time evolution at nearby irrational fluxes. Thus, the appealing intuitive picture of an Aharonov-Bohm interferometer is insufficient. Instead, we quantitatively explain our observations by transforming the HH model into a collection of momentum-space Aubry-André models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We quantum-simulated the 2D Harper-Hofstadter (HH) lattice model in a highly elongated tube geometry - three sites in circumference - using an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.