Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
An optimal quantum sampling regression algorithm for variational eigensolving in the low qubit number regime
arXiv
Authors: Pedro Rivero, Ian C. Cloët, Zack Sullivan
Year
2020
Paper ID
18741
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
130
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The VQE algorithm has turned out to be quite expensive to run given the way we currently access quantum processors (i.e. over the cloud). In order to alleviate this issue, we introduce Quantum Sampling Regression (QSR), an alternative hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, and analyze some of its use cases based on time complexity in the low qubit number regime. In exchange for some extra classical resources, this novel strategy is proved to be optimal in terms of the number of samples it requires from the quantum processor. We develop a simple analytical model to evaluate when this algorithm is more efficient than VQE, and, from the same theoretical considerations, establish a threshold above which quantum advantage can occur. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm for a benchmark problem.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The VQE algorithm has turned out to be quite expensive to run given the way we currently access quantum processors (i.e.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.