You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning for Covid-19 and Anderson Insulator Predictions
arXiv
Authors: Paul-Aymeric McRae, Michael Hilke
Year
2020
Paper ID
18680
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
103
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) algorithms to solve classifications problems have been made available thanks to recent advancements in quantum computation. While the number of qubits are still relatively small, they have been used for "quantum enhancement" of machine learning. An important question is related to the efficacy of such protocols. We evaluate this efficacy using common baseline data sets, in addition to recent coronavirus spread data as well as the quantum metal-insulator transition in three dimensions. For the computation, we used the 16 qubit IBM quantum computer. We find that the "quantum enhancement" is not generic and fails for more complex machine learning tasks.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum Machine Learning (QML) algorithms to solve classifications problems have been made available thanks to recent advancements in quantum computation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.