Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Calculating the distance from an electronic wave function to the manifold of Slater determinants through the geometry of Grassmannians
arXiv
Authors: Yuri Alexandre Aoto, Márcio Fabiano da Silva
Year
2020
Paper ID
18575
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The set of all electronic states that can be expressed as a single Slater determinant forms a submanifold, isomorphic to the Grassmannian, of the projective Hilbert space of wave functions. We explored this fact by using tools of Riemannian geometry of Grassmannians as described by Absil et. al [Acta App. Math. 80, 199 (2004)], to propose an algorithm that converges to a Slater determinant that is critical point of the overlap function with a correlated wave function. This algorithm can be applied to quantify the entanglement or correlation of a wave function. We show that this algorithm is equivalent to the Newton method using the standard parametrization of Slater determinants by orbital rotations, but it can be more efficiently implemented because the orbital basis used to express the correlated wave function is kept fixed throughout the iterations. We present the equations of this method for a general configuration interaction wave function and for a wave function with up to double excitations over a reference determinant. Applications of this algorithm to selected electronic systems are also presented and discussed.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The set of all electronic states that can be expressed as a single Slater determinant forms a submanifold, isomorphic to the Grassmannian, of the projective Hilbert space of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.