Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Comment on "Loss-Free Excitonic Quantum Battery"
arXiv
Authors: A. Tejero, J. Thingna, D. Manzano
Year
2020
Paper ID
18407
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
183
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In Ref. [J. Liu, D. Segal, and G. Hanna. J. Phys. Chem. C, 123, 18303 (2019)] there is a novel proposal of a quantum battery based on environmental interaction. The system studied is a para-Benzene ring with a symmetry that is broken in order to "redistribute the energy" creating a population imbalance between the sites. In this paper, the dynamics of the system is calculated under the single-excitation approximation and there is no discussion about its energetics. We do not discuss the authors' approach or numerical results on the single-excitation framework, but we would like to point out that observing the single-excitation populations is insufficient to obtain any information about the system's energetics. Since an infinite probe is attached to break the symmetries, it not only redistributes the energies as the authors suggest but the environment also exchanges energy with the system. Moreover, the accumulation of a single-excitation population at a specific site does not ensure that this site has more energy that can be extracted to do useful work. Thus, despite their single-excitation populations being correct, the para-Benzene's energetics do not behave as a battery.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In Ref.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.