Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Thermodynamics
Self-consistency of optimizing finite-time Carnot engines with the low-dissipation model
arXiv
Authors: Yu-Han Ma, C. P. Sun, Hui Dong
Year
2020
Paper ID
18376
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The efficiency at the maximum power (EMP) for finite-time Carnot engines established with the low-dissipation model, relies significantly on the assumption of the inverse proportion scaling of the irreversible entropy generation ΔS\(ir\) on the operation time τ, i.e., ΔS\(ir\)propto1/τ. The optimal operation time of the finite-time isothermal process for EMP has to be within the valid regime of the inverse proportion scaling. Yet, such consistency was not tested due to the unknown coefficient of the 1/τ-scaling. In this paper, using a two-level atomic heat engine as an illustration, we reveal that the optimization of the finite-time Carnot engines with the low-dissipation model is self-consistent only in the regime of ηCll1, where ηC is the Carnot efficiency. In the large-ηC regime, the operation time for EMP obtained with the low-dissipation model is not within the valid regime of the 1/τ-scaling, and the exact EMP is found to surpass the well-known bound η+=ηC/\(2-ηC\)
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The efficiency at the maximum power (EMP) for finite-time Carnot engines established with the low-dissipation model, relies significantly on the assumption of the inverse...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.