Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Gate-Based Circuit Designs For Quantum Adder Inspired Quantum Random Walks on Superconducting Qubits
arXiv
Authors: Daniel Koch, Michael Samodurov, Andrew Projansky, Paul M. Alsing
Year
2020
Paper ID
18283
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum Random Walks, which have drawn much attention over the past few decades for their distinctly non-classical behavior, is a promising subfield within Quantum Computing. Theoretical framework and applications for these walks have seen many great mathematical advances, with experimental demonstrations now catching up. In this study, we examine the viability of implementing Coin Quantum Random Walks using a Quantum Adder based Shift Operator, with quantum circuit designs specifically for superconducting qubits. We focus on the strengths and weaknesses of these walks, particularly circuit depth, gate count, connectivity requirements, and scalability. We propose and analyze a novel approach to implementing boundary conditions for these walks, demonstrating the technique explicitly in one and two dimensions. And finally, we present several fidelity results from running our circuits on IBM's quantum volume 32 `Toronto' chip, showcasing the extent to which these NISQ devices can currently handle quantum walks.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum Random Walks, which have drawn much attention over the past few decades for their distinctly non-classical behavior, is a promising subfield within Quantum Computing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.