Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Request-Answer Game with Buffer Model for Online Algorithms
arXiv
Authors: Kamil Khadiev
Year
2020
Paper ID
18167
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
123
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider online algorithms as a request-answer game. An adversary that generates input requests, and an online algorithm answers. We consider a generalized version of the game that has a buffer of limited size. The adversary loads data to the buffer, and the algorithm has random access to elements of the buffer. We consider quantum and classical (deterministic or randomized) algorithms for the model. In the paper, we provide a specific problem (The Most Frequent Keyword Problem) and a quantum algorithm that works better than any classical (deterministic or randomized) algorithm in terms of competitive ratio. At the same time, for the problem, classical online algorithms in the standard model are equivalent to the classical algorithms in the request-answer game with buffer model.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider online algorithms as a request-answer game.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.