Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Software Pipelining for Quantum Loop Programs
arXiv
Authors: Jingzhe Guo, Mingsheng Ying
Year
2020
Paper ID
18146
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a method for performing software pipelining on quantum for-loop programs, exploiting parallelism in and across iterations. We redefine concepts that are useful in program optimization, including array aliasing, instruction dependency and resource conflict, this time in optimization of quantum programs. Using the redefined concepts, we present a software pipelining algorithm exploiting instruction-level parallelism in quantum loop programs. The optimization method is then evaluated on some test cases, including popular applications like QAOA, and compared with several baseline results. The evaluation results show that our approach outperforms loop optimizers exploiting only in-loop optimization chances by reducing total depth of the loop program to close to the optimal program depth obtained by full loop unrolling, while generating much smaller code in size. This is the first step towards optimization of a quantum program with such loop control flow as far as we know.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a method for performing software pipelining on quantum for-loop programs, exploiting parallelism in and across iterations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.