Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
MAFFT-inspired Quantum Shift-based Sequence Alignment and its Efficient Simulation on Decision Diagrams
arXiv
Authors: Yusuke Kimura, Yutaka Takita
Year
2026
Paper ID
18120
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
188
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a core operation for comparing genome sequences and is widely used in bio-informatics. MAFFT, a practical MSA tool, repeatedly shifts a pair of sequences and computes a distance. Because the number of sequence pairs grows quadratically with the number of sequences, this procedure can become a bottleneck. We propose Quantum Shift-based Sequence Alignment (QShift-SA), which implements this "shift-wise score computation" as a gate-based quantum circuit and searches over shift amounts and sequence pairs using Grover algorithm. QShift-SA constructs an oracle circuit that compute the Hamming distance (the number of mismatches) between two sequences with data encoding, controlled shift, comparison, and addition. This oracle can search for candidates with small distances. QShift-SA does not aim to replace the full MSA workflow; instead, it targets the screening steps that often dominate the runtime in classical MAFFT as stated above. We evaluate circuit resources (number of qubits, gate count, and depth) and benchmark simulation time across multiple quantum circuit simulators. We find that a decision diagram (DD)-based quantum circuit simulator runs more than 1,000times faster than state-vector and MPS simulators and can handle larger circuits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a core operation for comparing genome sequences and is widely used in bio-informatics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.