Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
The Fast for the Curious: How to accelerate fault-tolerant quantum applications
arXiv
Authors: Sam McArdle, Alexander M. Dalzell, Aleksander Kubica, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
Year
2025
Paper ID
17883
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
93
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We evaluate strategies for reducing the run time of fault-tolerant quantum computations, targeting practical utility in scientific or industrial workflows. Delivering a technology with broad impact requires scaling devices, while also maintaining acceptable run times for computations. Optimizing logical clock speed may require moving beyond current strategies, and adopting methods that trade faster run time for increased qubit counts or engineering complexity. We discuss how the co-design of hardware, fault tolerance, and algorithmic subroutines can reduce run times. We illustrate a selection of these topics with resource estimates for simulating the Fermi-Hubbard model.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We evaluate strategies for reducing the run time of fault-tolerant quantum computations, targeting practical utility in scientific or industrial workflows.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.