Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Operator-aware shadow importance sampling for accurate fidelity estimation
arXiv
Authors: Hyunho Cha, Sangwoo Hong, Jungwoo Lee
Year
2025
Paper ID
17703
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
152
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Estimating the fidelity between an unknown quantum state and a fixed target is a fundamental task in quantum information science. Direct fidelity estimation (DFE) enables this without full tomography by sampling observables according to a target-dependent distribution. However, existing approaches face notable trade-offs. Grouping-based DFE achieves strong accuracy for small systems but suffers from exponential scaling, and its applicability is restricted to Pauli measurements. In contrast, classical-shadow-based DFE offers scalability but yields lower accuracy on structured states. In this work, we address these limitations by developing two classes of operator-aware shadow importance sampling algorithms using informationally overcomplete positive operator-valued measures. Instantiated with local Pauli measurements, our algorithm improves upon the grouping-based algorithms for Haar-random states. For structured states such as the GHZ and W states, our algorithm also eliminates the exponential memory requirements of previous grouping-based methods. Numerical experiments confirm that our methods achieve state-of-the-art performance across Haar-random, GHZ, and W targets.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Estimating the fidelity between an unknown quantum state and a fixed target is a fundamental task in quantum information science.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.