Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Enhancing NTRUEncrypt Security Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods: Theory and Practice
arXiv
Authors: Gautier-Edouard Filardo, Thibaut Heckmann
Year
2025
Paper ID
17666
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
100
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper presents a novel framework for enhancing the quantum resistance of NTRUEncrypt using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. We establish formal bounds on sampling efficiency and provide security reductions to lattice problems, bridging theoretical guarantees with practical implementations. Key contributions include: a new methodology for exploring private key vulnerabilities while maintaining quantum resistance, provable mixing time bounds for high-dimensional lattices, and concrete metrics linking MCMC parameters to lattice hardness assumptions. Numerical experiments validate our approach, demonstrating improved security guarantees and computational efficiency. These findings advance the theoretical understanding and practical adoption of NTRU- Encrypt in the post-quantum era.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper presents a novel framework for enhancing the quantum resistance of NTRUEncrypt using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.