Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Improving shadow estimation with locally-optimal dual frames
arXiv
Authors: Keijo Korhonen, Stefano Mangini, Joonas Malmi, Hetta Vappula, Daniel Cavalcanti
Year
2025
Paper ID
17656
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Accurate estimation of observables in quantum systems is a central challenge in quantum information science, yet practical implementations are fundamentally constrained by the limited number of measurement shots. In this work we explore a variation of the classical shadows protocol in which the measurements are kept local while allowing the resulting classical shadows themselves to be correlated. By constructing locally optimal shadows, we obtain unbiased estimators that outperform state-of-the-art methods, achieving the same accuracy with substantially fewer measurements. We validate our approach through numerical experiments on molecular Hamiltonians with up to 40 qubits and a 50-qubit Ising model consistently observing significant reductions in estimation errors.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Accurate estimation of observables in quantum systems is a central challenge in quantum information science, yet practical implementations are fundamentally constrained by the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.