Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Modifying the Time-Convolutionless Master Equation via the Moore-Penrose Pseudoinverse
arXiv
Authors: Caleb Blumenfeld
Year
2025
Paper ID
17655
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
113
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We attempt to modify the time-convolutionless master equation (TCL-ME) to be more resistant to breakdown. We remove the standard assumption that a portion of the generator is invertible by instead taking the Moore-Penrose inverse. We rederive the perturbative expansion using Israel and Charnes' result, and test the equation up to sixth and fifth orders on the Jaynes-Cummings and Ising models, respectively. We find that in both cases, the modified equation fails to capture the dynamics of the exact solution compared to the standard TCL due to the terms of the modified equation scaling exponentially with the dimension of the bath, and connect this failure to a loss of convergence of the perturbative expansion.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We attempt to modify the time-convolutionless master equation (TCL-ME) to be more resistant to breakdown.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.