Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quasiprobabilities from incomplete and overcomplete measurements
arXiv
Authors: Jan Sperling, Laura Ares, Elizabeth Agudelo
Year
2025
Paper ID
17553
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
95
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We discuss the (re-)construction of quasiprobability representations from generic measurements, including noisy ones. Based on the measurement under study, quasiprobabilities and the associated concept of nonclassicality are introduced. A practical concern that we address is the treatment of informationally incomplete and overcomplete measurement scenarios, which can significantly alter the assessment of which states are deemed classical. Notions, such as Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobabilities and s-parametrized quasiprobabilities in quantum optics, are generalized by our approach. Single-qubit systems are used to exemplify and to compare different measurement schemes, together with the resulting quasiprobabilities and set of nonclassical states.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We discuss the (re-)construction of quasiprobability representations from generic measurements, including noisy ones.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.