Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Adaptive quantum phase estimation can be better than non-adaptive

arXiv
Authors: Noah Linden, Ronald de Wolf

Year

2025

Paper ID

17469

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

136

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum phase estimation is one of the most important tools in quantum algorithms. It can be made non-adaptive meaning all applications of the unitary $U_φ$ happen simultaneously without using more applications of U_φ, albeit at the expense of using many more qubits. It is also known that there is no advantage for adaptive algorithms in the case where the phase that needs to be estimated is arbitrary or is uniformly random. Here we give examples of a special case of phase estimation, with a promise on the values that the unknown phase can take, where adaptive methods are provably better than non-adaptive methods by a factor of nearly 2 in the number of uses of U_φ. We also prove some upper bounds on the maximum advantage that adaptive algorithms for phase estimation can achieve over non-adaptive ones.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum phase estimation is one of the most important tools in quantum algorithms.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #17469 #68474 Concentration-Free Quantum Kern... #68470 A fluxonium qubit-based hybrid ... #68469 Pitfalls when tackling the expo... #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.