Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum advantage from effective 200-qubit holographic random circuit sampling
arXiv
Authors: Bingzhi Zhang, Quntao Zhuang
Year
2025
Paper ID
17466
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computers hold the promise of outperforming classical computers in solving certain problems. While large-scale quantum algorithms will require fault-tolerant devices, near-term demonstrations of quantum advantage on existing devices can provide important milestones. Random circuit sampling has emerged as a leading candidate for such demonstrations. However, existing implementations often underutilize circuit depth, limiting the achievable advantage. We introduce a holographic random circuit sampling algorithm that substantially increases the sampling complexity by leveraging repeated interactions and mid-circuit measurements. This approach scales the effective sampling dimension with the circuit depth, ultimately leading to an exponential growth in sampling complexity. With merely 20 physical qubits on IBM quantum devices, we experimentally demonstrate the effective sampling of up to 200 qubits, with a cross-entropy benchmark fidelity of 0.0593, establishing a new route to scalable quantum advantage through the combined use of spatial and temporal quantum resources.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum computers hold the promise of outperforming classical computers in solving certain problems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.