Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
No-signalling-projection-invariant Bell inequalities
arXiv
Authors: Soumyadip Patra, Jitendra Prakash, Aaditya Paudel, Peter Bierhorst
Year
2025
Paper ID
17406
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
120
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we highlight how any Bell inequality for a configuration involving n parties each performing one of m binary-outcome measurements has a canonical form that is no-signalling-projection invariant. Specifically, the L2-projection of weakly signalling data onto the no-signalling polytope leaves the violation of this canonical Bell inequality unchanged. Our methods allow us to derive a general closed formula for the projection and present a substantially more computationally simple procedure for its evaluation. We also show this can be generalised to non-standard projections of potential interest for certain applications. No-signalling projections serve as a preliminary step before undertaking any device-independent application involving Bell experiment data, such as hypothesis testing against local realism, random number generation and entanglement detection.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we highlight how any Bell inequality for a configuration involving n parties each performing one of m binary-outcome measurements has a canonical form that is...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.