Quick Navigation
Topics
Topological Quantum Computing
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Frustration as a Protection Mechanism in Non-Topological Majorana Qubits
arXiv
Authors: E. Novais
Year
2025
Paper ID
17269
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
110
Citations
N/A
Abstract
I analyze the decoherence of a π-junction qubit encoded by two co-located Majorana modes. Although not topologically protected, the qubit leverages distinct spatial profiles to couple to two independent environmental baths, realizing the phenomenon of quantum frustration. This mechanism is tested against the threat of quasiparticle poisoning (QP). I show that frustration is effective against Ohmic noise $s=1$ and has some protection for 0.76<s<1 sub-Ohmic noise. However, the experimentally prevalent 1/f noise $s→0$ falls deep within the model's localized phase, where frustration is insufficient. This causes Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and catastrophic decoherence. The qubit's viability depends on what is the effective environment that these local Majorana wave functions experience.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Topological Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- I analyze the decoherence of a π-junction qubit encoded by two co-located Majorana modes.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.