Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Mapping Game Theory to Quantum Systems: Nash Equilibria via Neutral Atom Computing
arXiv
Authors: Giovanni Ferrannini, Dario di Gregorio, Federico Fissore
Year
2025
Paper ID
17229
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
92
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Nash equilibria are crucial for understanding game behavior and systems in economics, physics, biology, and computer science. A significant application arises from the connection between Nash equilibria and optimization problems . However, finding Nash equilibria is challenging due to its NP-Hard complexity, specifically within the PPAD class. By exploiting the correspondence between Maximum Independent Sets (MIS) and Nash equilibria on unit-disk graphs, we map these problems onto the ground state configurations of Rydberg atom arrays. Simulations show the effectiveness of this quantum method, highlighting its potential for solving complex problems in game theory.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Nash equilibria are crucial for understanding game behavior and systems in economics, physics, biology, and computer science.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.