Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering
Quantum Chemistry
In-vacuum surface flashover of SiN, AlN, and etched SiO2 thin films at micrometre scales
arXiv
Authors: Vijay Kumar, Martin Siegele-Brown, Matthew Aylett, Sebastian Weidt, Winfried Karl Hensinger
Year
2025
Paper ID
17185
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
85
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the surface flashover voltage threshold for SiO2, SiN, and AlN thin films over micrometre scale lengths. Furthermore, we test the effects of different etching chemistries on SiO2 layers. We find that there is little significant difference between untreated SiO2 samples and those that have been etched with hydrogen fluoride or Transene AlPad Etch 639. SiN and AlN samples performed significantly better than all SiO2 samples giving a 45% increase in surface flashover voltage at a distance of 5 μm with the difference increasing with electrode spacing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the surface flashover voltage threshold for SiO2, SiN, and AlN thin films over micrometre scale lengths.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.