Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Advantage in Learning Mixed Unitary Channels
arXiv
Authors: Yue Tu, Liang Jiang
Year
2025
Paper ID
17020
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the task of learning mixed unitary channels using Fisher information, under different quantum resource assumptions including ancilla and concatenation. Our result shows that the asymptotic sample complexity scales as frac{r}{dvarepsilon2}, where r is the rank of the channel (i.e.\ the number of different unitaries), d is the dimension of the system, and varepsilon2 is the mean-square error. Thus the critical resource is the ancilla, which mirrors the result in \cite{chen2022quantum} but in a more precise form, as we point out that r is also important. Additionally, we demonstrate the practical potential of mixed unitary channels by showing that random mixed unitary channels are easy to learn.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the task of learning mixed unitary channels using Fisher information, under different quantum resource assumptions including ancilla and concatenation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.