Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
QASER: Breaking the Depth vs. Accuracy Trade-Off for Quantum Architecture Search
arXiv
Authors: Ioana Moflic, Alexandru Paler, Akash Kundu
Year
2025
Paper ID
16883
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computing faces a key challenge: balancing the need for low circuit depth (crucial for fault tolerance) with the high accuracy required for complex computations like quantum chemistry and error correction, which typically require deeper circuits. We overcome this trade-off by introducing a novel reinforcement learning approach featuring engineered reward functions, called QASER, that take into account seemingly contradictory optimization goals. This reward enables the compilation of circuits with lower depth and higher accuracy, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art techniques. Benchmarks on quantum chemistry state preparation circuits demonstrate stable compilations. We achieve up to 50% improved accuracy, while reducing 2-qubit gate counts and depths by 20%. This advancement enables more efficient and reliable quantum compilation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum computing faces a key challenge: balancing the need for low circuit depth (crucial for fault tolerance) with the high accuracy required for complex computations like...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.