Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Analytical Fock Representation of Two-Mode Squeezing for Quantum Interference
arXiv
Authors: Xuemei Gu, Carlos Ruiz-Gonzalez, Mario Krenn
Year
2025
Paper ID
16865
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
124
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Two-mode squeezing is central to entangled-photon generation and nonlinear interferometry, yet standard perturbative low-gain treatments and Gaussian formalisms can obscure the interference of photon-number amplitudes, especially in nonlinear interferometers and at high gain. Here we derive a closed-form Fock-basis expression for the action of the two-mode squeezing operator on arbitrary number states, enabling the direct analysis of nonlinear interferometers in the photon-number basis at arbitrary squeezing strength. Within this framework, we provide intuitive physical interpretations of several known quantum-interference effects and identify a new multi-photon interference phenomenon in a four-crystal geometry that could readily be observed in laboratories. Our work provides a compact analytic toolkit and explicit design rules for engineering multi-photon interference, with applications in quantum sensing, precision metrology, and quantum state generation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Two-mode squeezing is central to entangled-photon generation and nonlinear interferometry, yet standard perturbative low-gain treatments and Gaussian formalisms can obscure the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.