Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Exceptional line and pseudospectrum in black hole spectroscopy

arXiv
Authors: Li-Ming Cao, Ming-Fei Ji, Liang-Bi Wu, Yu-Sen Zhou

Year

2025

Paper ID

16823

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

127

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate the exceptional points (EPs) and their pseudospectra in black hole perturbation theory. By considering a Gaussian bump modification to the Regge-Wheeler potential with variable amplitude, position, and width parameters, \(varepsilon,d,σ0\), a continuous line of EPs (exceptional line, EL) in this three-dimensional parameter space is revealed. We find that the vorticity ν=pm1/2 and the Berry phase γ=π for loops encircling the EL, while ν=0 and γ=0 for those do not encircle the EL. Through matrix perturbation theory, we prove that the ε-pseudospectrum contour size scales as ε1/q at an EP, where q is the order of the largest Jordan block of the Hamiltonian-like operator, contrasting with the linear ε scaling at non-EPs. Numerical implements confirm this observation, demonstrating enhanced spectral instability at EPs for non-Hermitian systems including black holes.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate the exceptional points (EPs) and their pseudospectra in black hole perturbation theory.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #16823

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.