Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Robust detection of an entanglement transition in the projective transverse field Ising model

arXiv
Authors: Felix Roser, Etienne M. Springer, Hans Peter Büchler, Nicolai Lang

Year

2025

Paper ID

16801

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose a scalable and noise-resilient protocol for the detection of the entanglement transition in a projective version of the transverse field Ising model. Entanglement transitions are experimentally difficult to observe due to the inherent randomness of projective measurements and noise in large-scale experimental settings. Our approach combines error correction algorithms with classical shadow tomography to overcome both problems. This allows for experimentally accessible upper and lower bounds on the entanglement transition without postselection or full state tomography. These bounds remain robust under noise and their sharpness is a measure of the noise rate.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose a scalable and noise-resilient protocol for the detection of the entanglement transition in a projective version of the transverse field Ising model.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #16801 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe... #69589 An integrated ultrahigh vacuum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.